Feedback / experience at point-of-care scenarios or in time-sensitive scenarios?
Interested to hear how others are collecting light feedback / sentiment for application interactions where interjecting guides or collecting feedback needs to stay out of the way of the user flow. The types of scenarios where this feels applicable is for any type of application used at the point of care (physicians, EMS, emergency response, and similar).
I've seen a few applications collect a quick 1 - 5 score (with auto-submission) and then come back to those users in later interactions to collect qualitative feedback. This minimizes the time-sensitive interactions to a quant score and defers the verbatims or deeper prompts to later points where it's safe to follow-up without the distraction tax.
Any other ideas or experiences that have worked in similar scenarios?
Comments
Something we've seen have improved completion rates in scenarios like this is the "minimized guide step" Angus Yang came up with the idea and posted it in the community here.
Similar to what you suggested above, this keeps the distraction tax to a minimum while still allowing users to revisit a poll and provide the qual/quant inputs that you need to capture.
Hi Ben Carey,
Great question! I remember during our 20' Pendmonium, we had a customer that presented on a similar topic: "How to Solicit In-Product User Feedback with Pendo".
The customer saw better responses when they personalized the guide more. You can pull in metadata to your guides.
Next is making sure the segment is correct. Is your target audience dedicated to a task before these questions? Is the feature, page setting, mood right at the time?
Keep it simple and easy-to-read — Anyone should be able to go through the survey quickly and easily.
Also, there was an improvement in responses by adding an extra step at the beginning of the survey as a disclaimer or asking if it was a good time to task them with a survey.
Please sign in to leave a comment.